May 11, 2004
Pulling Back the Curtains
A lot of people have asked us to “pull back the curtains” on Congress. What’s going on back there? Answer: Not much, and you can thank Tom DeLay:
The week of April 26 was eventful and troubling for the nation, yet curiously brief and serene for the House of Representatives. Thirty-five U.S. servicemen were killed in Iraq. CBS aired shocking photos of Americans abusing prisoners near Baghdad. The federal debt reached an all-time high, more than $7.13 trillion.
In the House, meanwhile, members returned to Washington on Tuesday of that week for three quick, unanimous votes at nightfall. They renamed a post office in Rhode Island, honored the founder of the Lions Clubs, and supported “the goals and ideals of Financial Literacy Month.”
The next day, Wednesday, was a bit busier. After naming a Miami courthouse for a dead judge, House members debated how to extend the popular repeal of the tax code’s “marriage penalty.” The only real issue was whether to pass the Democratic or Republican version. The GOP plan prevailed, 323 to 95.
The House’s lean schedule is no accident. GOP leaders who set the agenda and floor schedule say they achieved most of their top priorities last year—including enactment of a Medicare prescription drug bill and the third round of President Bush’s tax cuts—and are content to rest on their laurels through the election. While other House priorities are stuck in the Senate, House Republicans believe they have the best of all worlds: They can take credit for the enacted legislation and blame Senate Democrats for bottling up the rest of their agenda.
“Last year we sent a lot of legislation to the Senate, and we don’t want to overload them,” House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) told reporters last week. “They’re already overloaded. . . . We need to be here passing good legislation, doing the people’s work and not doing a bunch of make-work.”
House Democrats see a more cynical motive. The GOP majority, they say, wants a complacent Congress that will raise few questions about the Bush administration, despite the international uproar over the prison abuse scandal in Iraq and recent damaging revelations about Bush’s decision to go to war.
“Given all the issues and problems the country faces, it’s scandalous that we’re only coming in to work three days a week, and even then most of the time we’re renaming post offices,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). “This is a deliberate effort to keep Congress out of town, keep us from asking questions.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) noted that senators held three committee hearings on the prison abuses before House leaders summoned Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to the Armed Services Committee last Friday—a day the Senate was meeting but the House was not. DeLay dismissed the idea of a full-fledged congressional investigation, which he likened to “saying we need an investigation every time there’s police brutality on the street.”