While voters tuned in to ABC27 tonight, new reporting in the PA10 congressional race dropped during the debate.
As first reported by HuffPost, Scott Perry went from “hailing Project 2025” on right-wing radio to pretending like he knows nothing about it during a tele-townhall. Just a month before claiming he “didn’t know much” about it, Perry praised Project 2025, which would rip health care from people with pre-existing conditions, propose the government monitor abortions and punish any states that refuse to share that information, and raise taxes on Pennsylvania families.
DCCC Spokesperson Aidan Johnson:
“Despite his efforts to mislead voters, it’s clear Scott Perry supports a nationwide abortion ban with no exceptions, wants to gut seniors’ hard-earned benefits, and has never moderated his extreme agenda — so it’s no surprise that he supports Project 2025. He said Republicans need to ‘accept’ the agenda and that he will carry it out. Voters will ensure he doesn’t get that opportunity.”
HuffPost: GOP Rep. Scott Perry Went From Hailing Project 2025 To Knowing Nothing About It
Jennifer Bendery | October 8, 2024
-
Ahead of the November elections, Republicans have been scrambling to distance themselves from Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s 900-page, right-wing policy blueprint for radically restructuring the U.S. government under a second Trump presidency.
-
For Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), who is running for reelection in a very tight race, the exact moment he backed away from it appears to have been between July and August, when he suddenly shifted from celebrating Project 2025 to pretending he didn’t know much about it at all.
-
The issue could come up ― and could prove to be awkward ― during Perry’s Tuesday night debate with his Democratic challenger, former TV news anchor Janelle Stelson. It’s their first and only debate before the November election. The Cook Political Report’s rating for this seat in Pennsylvania’s 10th congressional district is “lean Republican.” Perry and Stelson are virtually tied in the polls, per the polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight.
-
But in his interview, Perry said he agreed with Stigall in that there’s nothing “secret or subversive” about Project 2025, which was put together by former Trump administration officials, and calls for purging thousands of career civil servants from federal government agencies and replacing them with vetted conservatives in a second Trump administration.
-
“It’s a coalition of different organizations that are generally like-minded, but not completely, that are trying to be prepared for a future Trump presidency,” Perry said of the people behind it.
-
“Making Trump be the bogeyman hasn’t really worked over the last year-and-a-half, so now [Democrats] are making it the Heritage Foundation and this thing, this being prepared, having names vetted, having policies prepared, they’re making that the bogeyman,” he said.
-
“These people on the left are scared to death that there actually could be some accountability, and that they’re not going to be able to just sit in there and promote their leftist agenda and say, ‘Oh, Mr. President, we don’t work for you. We’re just going to wait you out for four years and we’re going to continue to march towards communism,’” Perry told Stigall.
-
“To be truthful with you, Anthony, I haven’t read through it,” Perry told the constituent. “I mean, I’ve seen the cover of maybe the first page or something.”
-
He suggested he would support parts of Project 2025 that he liked and oppose the parts he didn’t like if a future president used it as a roadmap. He also suggested he didn’t know much about who was behind Project 2025, even though, a month earlier, he knew all about it.
-
“I know some of the folks, well, at the Her– it was written, well, no, I don‘t know if it was shepherded or put together by the Heritage Foundation, but it’s not exclusive of the Heritage Foundation, or, to the Heritage Foundation,” Perry said. “It includes other organizations, as I understand it, and likely I don’t even know who some of those organizations are.”
-
He added that he’s “always a little careful, or a lot careful” about what he signs onto without reading the details of it because once you do, “You own it, and uh, the good with the bad.”
|